Post by account_disabled on Mar 7, 2024 1:59:10 GMT -5
The training developed by the Group does not focus on the field of Law. Through ITTI High Tech Institute & Sports, it promotes the most specialized training in the sports and technology sector thanks to alliances forged with institutions such as FC Barcelona or the Royal Spanish Football Federation. The good progress of Economist & Jurist Group during these and the entrepreneurial nature of its managers has led to the creation of subsidiaries that have led to diversification into other activities. That is the case of CIMA in the field of marketing and communication; or Shenonkop , in the hotel and restaurant sector.
The entry of a resolution in a body of the AEAT is equivalent to informing any body of that Administration "Denying knowledge of what the ORT already knows constitutes a blatant and incomprehensible violation of the principle of good administration" Tax agency. (Photo: Archive) The Contentious-Administrative Fax Lists Chamber, Section 2, of the Supreme Court, in ruling 877/2023 of June 28, declares that, “ for the purposes of the dies a quo for the filing of the appeal by bodies of the Tax Administration before the TEAC , it is sufficient with the communication received in the Office of Relations with the Courts (ORT) or in any other department, agency or office of the Administration, which has received it for the purposes of its execution, so that, if the period has elapsed "As of such knowledge, no appeal has been filed, the resolution will remain final.
Starting from the principle of single legal personality of the Administration, the basic concepts of notification and communications between bodies of the same Administration should not be confused , which are internal acts between them and do not participate in the nature, guarantees and rights that the law reserves for notifications. Background of the case In the present case, the AEAT agreed, on February 27, 2015, to execute the resolution issued by the TEAR of Madrid on October 28, 2014, which expressly states the date entered into the ORT: December 2, 2014.
The entry of a resolution in a body of the AEAT is equivalent to informing any body of that Administration "Denying knowledge of what the ORT already knows constitutes a blatant and incomprehensible violation of the principle of good administration" Tax agency. (Photo: Archive) The Contentious-Administrative Fax Lists Chamber, Section 2, of the Supreme Court, in ruling 877/2023 of June 28, declares that, “ for the purposes of the dies a quo for the filing of the appeal by bodies of the Tax Administration before the TEAC , it is sufficient with the communication received in the Office of Relations with the Courts (ORT) or in any other department, agency or office of the Administration, which has received it for the purposes of its execution, so that, if the period has elapsed "As of such knowledge, no appeal has been filed, the resolution will remain final.
Starting from the principle of single legal personality of the Administration, the basic concepts of notification and communications between bodies of the same Administration should not be confused , which are internal acts between them and do not participate in the nature, guarantees and rights that the law reserves for notifications. Background of the case In the present case, the AEAT agreed, on February 27, 2015, to execute the resolution issued by the TEAR of Madrid on October 28, 2014, which expressly states the date entered into the ORT: December 2, 2014.